Skip to Content
Great Lakes ADA Center Logo
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Mailing List
  • Listserv
  • Site Map
  • Acronyms
  • Español
  • Contact Us
  • 800-949-4232(V/TTY) to learn more

   Home » Resources » Supreme Court Cases » 2003 Cases
  • WHAT IS...

    • About Us
    • ADA
    • Technical Assistance
    • Accessible Technology
    • Great Lakes
      Affiliates
    • National Network of ADA Centers
  • INFORMATION

    • Publications
    • Research
    • Legal Briefs
    • Supreme Court Cases
    • Business Tool Kit
    • HOPE Project
  • SERVICES

    • Online Learning Opportunities
    • Training
    • Programs and Services
    • ADA Audio Conference
    • ADA Legal Webinar Series
    • Accessible Technology Webinar Series
  • RESOURCES

    • ADA Resources
    • Current Great Lakes Chronicle
    • Great Lakes Chronicle Archives
    • Current Great Lakes Blog
    • Great Lakes Blog Archives
    • ASL RESOURCE PAGE
    • Employment Resource Hub
QIAT

2003 Cases

Definition of Employee

Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P. C. v. Wells

Issue: Whether the four physician-shareholders who own the professional corporation and constitute its board of directors are counted as employees for purposes of determining whether or not the corporation was covered under the Employment Provisions of the ADA by having 15 or more employees.

The Court held that the common-law element of control is the principal guidepost to be followed in deciding whether the four director-shareholder physicians in this case should be counted as employees and listed six factors that are relevant to such a decision. "Because the District Court's findings appear to weigh in favor of concluding that the four physicians are not clinic employees, but evidence in the record may contradict those findings or support a contrary conclusion," the Court remanded the case for a determination under the new standard.

Employer Rehire Policy

Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez (2003)

Issue: Does the Americans with Disabilities Act permit employers to refuse to rehire job applicants because of prior workplace rule infractions related to drug or alcohol addiction?

The Court finds that under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a neutral no-rehire policy is a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for refusing to hire an employee who had a record of drug addiction.

  • 1998 Cases
  • 1999 Cases
  • 2001 Cases
  • 2002 Cases
  • 2003 Cases
  • 2004 Cases
  • 2005 Cases
  • 2017 Cases
 

Last Updated on:
Mon Jun 13, 2022


UIC Department of Disability and Human Development's Logo
ACL Logo

Grant Disclaimer    Accessibility Statement     Contact Us
ADA National Network Logo